首页> 外文OA文献 >Is the adapted Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) developed internationally to measure food insecurity valid in urban and rural households of Ethiopia?
【2h】

Is the adapted Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) developed internationally to measure food insecurity valid in urban and rural households of Ethiopia?

机译:改编的家庭粮食不安全准入量表(HFIas)是否已在国际上制定,以衡量埃塞俄比亚城乡家庭的粮食不安全状况?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background The concept of food insecurity encompasses three dimensions. One of these dimensions, the access component of household food insecurity is measured through the use of the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS). Despite its application in Ethiopia and other similar developing countries, its performance is still poorly explored. Our study aims to evaluate the validity of the HFIAS in Ethiopia. Methods We conducted repeated cross-sectional studies in urban and rural villages of the Butajera District in southern Ethiopia. The validation was conducted on a pooled sample of 1,516 households, which were selected using a simple random sampling method. The HFIAS was translated into the local Amharic language and tested for face validity. We also evaluated the tool’s internal consistency using Cronbach’s alpha and factor analysis. We tested for parallelism on HFIAS item response curves across wealth status and further evaluated the presence of a dose-response relationship between the food insecurity level and the consumption of food items, as well as between household wealth status and food insecurity. Additionally, we evaluated the reproducibility of the tool through the first and second round of HFIAS scores. Results The HFIAS exhibited a good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha for the values of rounds 1 and 2 were 0.76 and 0.73, respectively). A factor analysis (varimax rotation) resulted in two main factors: the first factor described a level of mild to moderate food insecurity, while the second factor described severe food insecurity. HFIAS item response curves were parallel across wealth status in the sample households, with a dose-response trend between food insecurity levels and the likelihood of previous day food consumption being observed. The overall HFIAS score did not change over the two rounds of data collection. Conclusions The HFIAS is a simple and valid tool to measure the access component of household food insecurity. However, we recommend the adaptation of questions and wordings and adding examples before application, as we found a discrepancy in understanding of some of the nine HFIAS questions.
机译:背景粮食不安全的概念包括三个方面。这些维度之一是通过使用《家庭粮食不安全获取量表》(HFIAS)来衡量家庭粮食不安全的获取部分。尽管它在埃塞俄比亚和其他类似的发展中国家中得到了应用,但其性能仍然很少得到探索。我们的研究旨在评估HFIAS在埃塞俄比亚的有效性。方法我们在埃塞俄比亚南部Butajera区的城市和乡村进行了反复的横断面研究。验证是对1,516户家庭的汇总样本进行的,这些样本是使用简单的随机抽样方法选择的。 HFIAS被翻译成当地的阿姆哈拉语,并测试了脸部有效性。我们还使用Cronbach的alpha和因子分析评估了该工具的内部一致性。我们测试了整个财富状况下HFIAS项目反应曲线的平行性,并进一步评估了粮食不安全水平与食物消费之间以及家庭财富状况与粮食不安全之间是否存在剂量反应关系。此外,我们通过第一轮和第二轮HFIAS评分评估了该工具的可重复性。结果HFIAS显示出良好的内部一致性(第1轮和第2轮的Cronbachα值分别为0.76和0.73)。因素分析(最大波动)导致两个主要因素:第一个因素描述了轻度至中度的粮食不安全水平,而第二个因素描述了严重的粮食不安全状况。 HFIAS项目响应曲线在样本家庭中的财富状况之间是平行的,在食品不安全水平和前一天食用食物的可能性之间存在剂量响应趋势。在两轮数据收集中,HFIAS的总体得分没有变化。结论HFIAS是一种简单有效的工具,可以衡量家庭粮食不安全的获取因素。但是,我们建议对问题和措词进行改编,并在应用之前添加示例,因为我们发现在对9个HFIAS问题中的一些理解上存在差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号